Campaign Signs an Environmental Burden

With the elections looming, political signs are everywhere from street corners to front yards. Many feel that this is an environmental disgrace, creating much unwanted litter and waste, as well as "visual pollution".

Discussing his view of the situation, reader and Realtor Tony Scornavacca, Jr. submitted his thoughts to us:

The evidence is boldly clear. In Miami-Dade, 100% of candidates
for elected office are indifferent to the greening of the planet.

 

No matter what they say, it’s their actions that speak the truth.

This is shown by the signage (otherwise known as litter) that is
plastered all over the county. Their true audacity is extremely
apparent when those candidates have the signs displayed on public
roadsides. It’s as if that area of public property is theirs and theirs
alone, and to be utilized for the glorification of themselves.

 

Yes, a private property owner is entitled to adorn his lawn with
whatever he chooses. However in Miami I know that in order to erect a
sign, a sign permit is required. Is the permit requirement waived for
those who advertise themselves? No. It’s just that this is an accepted
practice. Accepted by code enforcement officers, not by the public.

 

I suggest that all political posters be abolished. To go one step
further I suggest that Florida emulate Hawaii by removing all
billboards. That’s right. There are no billboards in the state of
Hawaii.

 

Now, THAT is green.

We’d love to hear everyone’s thoughts in the comments below. Here’s my question: do you think the signs work? Do they affect yours, or anyone’s voting decisions? Interestingly enough, it seems that the State of Florida has big goals for recycling the campaign signs this year. Let’s hope Miami participates. We’ll keep you posted when we find out where they can be recycled.

Related:
Treehugger suggests using the campaign signs to create a DIY Solar Heater.
Red, Green, and Blue ponders what the next generation of campaign signs will be made of.